Septembrie 2011


„We have heard the comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany. I don’t like this comparison because I really think that Israel is far worse than Nazi Germany.”

Those are the words of Gilad Atzmon, a little known expatriate Israeli who divides his time between working as a jazz musician and campaigning against the Jewish community in all its manifestations. He has written that he not only opposes Israel and Zionism, but any Jewish collective enterprise, including even „Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist networks”. In fact, he describes himself as someone who is proud of being a „self-hating Jew”.

History teaches us that the most universally inspiring Jews, I mean, those who contributed something to humanity rather than merely to their own people or even just themselves, were motivated by some form of self hate. The first names that come to mind are Christ, Spinoza and Marx.

Of the Holocaust, Atzmon has written that he not only doubts it occurred as historians and survivors describe,he thinks that what did occur was justified.

It took me years to accept that the Holocaust narrative, in its current form, doesn’t make any historical sense. Here is just one little anecdote to elaborate on: If, for instance, the Nazis wanted the Jews out of their Reich (Judenrein – free of Jews), or even dead, as the Zionist narrative insists, how come they marched hundreds of thousands of them back into the Reich at the end of the war?

. . . (I)f the Nazis ran a death factory in Auschwitz-Birkenau, why would the Jewish prisoners join them at the end of the war? Why didn’t the Jews wait for their Red liberators?

I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start to ask the necessary questions. We should ask for some conclusive historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws. We should strip the holocaust of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place

65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz we should reclaim our history and ask why? Why were the Jews hated? Why did European people stand up against their next door neighbours? Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East, surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history? If they genuinely planned to do so, as the early Zionists claimed, why did they fail? Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews? We should also ask for what purpose do the holocaust denial laws serve? What is the holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocons agents’ plots.

He not only doubts that the Holocaust actually occurred, and thinks that whatever did happen to the Jews of Europe was justified, he goes on to argue that opposition to those who think like him is the manifestation of an irrational intolerance of non-Jews which is at the core of the Jewish identity. (Read here.) Elsewhere, Atzmon has described the Nazi’s treatment of Jews as an understandable response to Jewish aggression against Germany.   (Read here.)

In spite of all this, Atzmon objects to describing his views as Holocaust denial, not because he believes what historians say about the subject, but because he dismisses the idea itself.

I … find the notion of ‘holocaust denial’ to be meaningless, and on the verge of idiotic.

When put on the spot in an interview, Atzmon has said that he cannot be sure the Holocaust occurred because he „is not a historian”.

Atzmon distinguishes himself from most anti-Zionists in that he admits that anti-Zionism is motivated by hatred of Jews, which he rationalizes in the following manner:

Unlike Uri Avnery and Norman Finkelstein who . . . argue that anti-Semitism is exaggerated, I actually believe that resentment towards Jewish politics is rising rapidly and constantly. However, I do differentiate between the Judeo-centric notion of anti-Semitism and political resentment towards Jewish ideology. I do not regard anti-Jewish activity as a form of anti-Semitism or racial hatred because Jews are neither Semites nor do they form a racial continuum whatsoever. The rise of hatred towards any form of Jewish politics and Jewish lobbies is a reaction towards a tribal, chauvinist and supremacist ideology.

Thus Atzmon argues that he and others like him cannot be bigoted against Jews because the belief in Jewish ethnicity itself is a manifestation of Jewish racism. By this twisted logic, Jews are inherently racist and those who hate them are inherently anti-racist.

Atzmon has also written at length that he believes anti-Semitic stereotypes to be accurate reflections of essential truths about the nature of Jews, even while disparaging the importance of real history.  He writes:

Fagin is the ultimate plunderer, a child exploiter and usurer. Shylock is the blood-thirsty merchant. With Fagin and Shylock in mind Israeli barbarism and organ trafficking seem to be just other events in an endless hellish continuum. However, it is also obvious why the HET [British Holocaust Education Trust] is so thrilled by Anne Frank. On the face of it, and for obvious reasons, Frank is there to convey an image of innocence. And indeed not a single moral system could ever justify the ordeal this young girl went through along with many others. Yet, Anne Frank wasn’t exactly a literary genius. Her diary is not a valuable piece of literature. She wasn’t an exceptionally clever either. [sic]

In that spirit of valuing bigoted myths over historical facts, Atzmon actually goes so far as to defend the „Protocols of the Elders of Zion” as revealing essential truths about the Jews. (Read here.)

You may be wondering why I am boring you with a detailed examination of the thoughts of an obvious crank who would only find support for his deranged and cynical bigotry among others of similarly fringe views. You may be interested to learn that among Atzmon’s supporters is Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago’s Program on International Security Policy. Mearsheimer provided the following blurb for the back cover of Atzmon’s most recent book, the contents of which are reportedly consistent with his previous hateful work:

‘Gilad Atzmon has written a fascinating and provocative book on Jewish identity in the modern world. He shows how assimilation and liberalism are making it incredibly difficult for Jews in the Diaspora to maintain a powerful sense of their ‘Jewishness.’ Panicked Jewish leaders, he argues, have turned to Zionism (blind loyalty to Israel) and scaremongering (the threat of another Holocaust) to keep the tribe united and distinct from the surrounding goyim. As Atzmon’s own case demonstrates, this strategy is not working and is causing many Jews great anguish. The Wandering Who? Should be widely read by Jews and non-Jews alike.’

When I read that quote on the website of Atzmon’s literary agent, I doubted it’s veracity.  I had trouble believing that a distinguished professor at one of the world’s greatest universities would link himself to a hatemonger like Atzmon.  So I sent Professor Mearsheimer an email quoting the blurb and asking him to verify it’s accuracy.  I also gave him an opportunity to amend it or add to it.  Here’s what he wrote back:

The blurb below is the one I wrote for „The Wandering Who” and I have no reason to amend it or embellish it, as it accurately reflects my view of the book.

Professor Mearsheimer has certainly reached the heights of achievement in his field and respect for this would be appropriate, regardless of whether one agrees with his opinions.  Moreover, this world is increasingly filled with gratuitous ad hominem attacks, arbitrarily flung at ideological adversaries to divert attention from substantive arguments.  In this instance, however, Mearsheimer is using his authority as an expert in his field to promote the work of a flagrant bigot and distorter of history.  If denunciation in the strongest terms is not appropriate in response to this grossly misguided act, when would it be?  Mearsheimer, in praising Atzmon, lends his name and that of his university to the promotion of anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.  That is simply inexcusable.

Gilad Atzmon is a jazz saxophonist who lives in London and who has a side gig disseminating the wildest sort of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. He is an ex-Israeli and a self-proclaimed „self-hater” who traffics in Holocaust denial and all sorts of grotesque, medieval anti-Jewish calumnies. Here is a small sample of his lunatic thoughts (bold text is mine):

I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start to ask the necessary questions. We should ask for some conclusive historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws. We should strip the holocaust of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place.

Sixty-five years after the liberation of Auschwitz we should reclaim our history and ask why?Why were the Jews hated? Why did European people  stand up against their next door neighbours? Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East, surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history? If they genuinely planned to do so, as the early Zionists claimed, why did they fail? Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews? We should also ask for what purpose do the holocaust denial laws serve? What is the holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocons agents’ plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes against humanity…

The Holocaust  became the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it is the most sinister religion known to man. It is a license to kill, to flatten, no nuke, to wipe, to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It made vengeance and revenge into a Western value.

Atzmon also believes that the Jews persecuted Hitler:

Not many people are aware that in March 1933, long before Hitler became the undisputed leader of Germany and began restricting the rights of German Jews, the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Gardens and called for an American boycott of German goods…

….Jewish texts tend to glaze over the fact that Hitler’s March 28 1933, ordering a boycott against Jewish stores and goods, was an escalation in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish leadership.

He has also suggested that Jews specialize in the trafficking of body parts:

Fagin is the ultimate plunderer, a child exploiter and usurer. Shylock is the blood-thirsty merchant. With Fagin and Shylock in mind Israeli barbarism and organ trafficking seem to be just other events in an endless hellish continuum.

Atzmon is quite obviously a twisted and toxic hater. His antisemitism is so blatant that activists of the so-called BDS movement (boycott, divestment and sanctions), which seeks the elimination of Israel, refuse to have anything to do with him. But Atzmon still has at least one friend among anti-Israel activists: The R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and co-author of „The Israel Lobby,” John J. Mearsheimer.

Rather unbelievably (or believably, depending on where you sit) Mearsheimer has written an endorsement of Atzmon’s new book, „The Wandering Who?” Here is what Mearsheimer says about Atzmon:

Gilad Atzmon has written a fascinating and provocative book on Jewish identity in the modern world. He shows how assimilation and liberalism are making it incredibly difficult for Jews in the Diaspora to maintain a powerful sense of their ‘Jewishness.’ Panicked Jewish leaders, he argues, have turned to Zionism (blind loyalty to Israel) and scaremongering (the threat of another Holocaust) to keep the tribe united and distinct from the surrounding goyim. As Atzmon’s own case demonstrates, this strategy is not working and is causing many Jews great anguish. The Wandering Who? Should be widely read by Jews and non-Jews alike.’

In this new book, Atzmon suggests, among other things, that scholars should reopen the question of medieval blood libels leveled against Jews– accusations that Jews used the blood of Christian children to make matzo, and which provoked countless massacres of Jews in many different countries.

If you recall from the fight over „The Israel Lobby,” which Mearsheimer wrote with Stephen Walt, of Harvard, the authors claimed that they were simply writing a critique of American foreign policy, and of certain American citizens who, they said, „distorted” foreign policy. Many of us disagreed. Here is a bit of what David Rothkopf wrote about Mearsheimer and Walt: „W)hatever the pale intellectual merits of his hackneyed argument may be (the authors) know full well that their prominence on this issue has come not because they have had a single new insight but rather because they were willing and one can only believe inclined to play to a crowd whose ‘views’ were fueled by prejudice and worse. They may not be anti-Semites themselves but they made a cynical decision to cash in on anti-Semitism by offering to dress up old hatreds in the dowdy Brooks Brothers suits of the Kennedy School and the University of Chicago.”

Now, Mearsheimer is endorsing the writing of a man who espouses neo-Nazi views. In other words, he’s not even bothering to make believe anymore – he’s moved from a self-described critic of Israel to a corrosive critic of Jewry itself. The blogger Adam Holland, like yours truly, didn’t quite believe that Mearsheimer would endorse such a crude anti-Semite, so he asked him to confirm:

I had trouble believing that a distinguished professor at one of the world’s greatest universities would link himself to a hatemonger like Atzmon. So I sent Professor Mearsheimer an email quoting the blurb and asking him to verify it’s accuracy.  I also gave him an opportunity to amend it or add to it.  Here’s what he wrote back:

„The blurb below is the one I wrote for „The Wandering Who” and I have no reason to amend it or embellish it, as it accurately reflects my view of the book.”

Gliad Atzmon, by the way, is also on record saying this:

 „I believe that from certain ideological perspective, Israel is actually far worse than Nazi Germany.”

Perhaps Mearsheimer has found a new co-author.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/09/john-mearsheimer-endorses-a-hitler-apologist-and-holocaust-revisionist/245518/

After his 2009 Cairo speech in which he stressed the right of Palestine to exist, US President Barack Obama’s comments at the UN General Assembly on Wednesday underlined a serious change of position. Obama told the UNGA that he opposes the Palestinian bid for recognition of a state; a declaration that was met with joy and appreciation by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The PM lauded Obama saying that he was wearing “a badge of honor” by insisting that negotiations are the only way to peace.
Decades of negotiations between Israel and Palestinian leaderships have yielded no positive results for the Palestinians. PA leader Mahmoud Abbas himself said a year earlier that 18 years of negotiations have hit the wall.
At the UN, Obama said that there could be “no shortcuts” to peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians, and that negotiations between the two parties would be the only means to achieving a true and lasting peace. He assured Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that a UN action would not achieve a Palestinian state and the United States would veto any Security Council move to recognize Palestinian statehood.

The president of a country that had waged wars on Iraq and Afghanistan where it killed hundreds of thousands civilians, injured and displaced millions others, had all the nerve to talk about “peace” before the UNGA and recount Israel’s tragedy of being the victim of its Arab neighbors who have waged consecutive wars against it and sought to wipe it off the map.
29 years this month Israel oversaw the execution of 3500 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon during the 1982 invasion, waged more wars during the past two decades on Lebanon and occupied Palestinian territories, however, Obama’s dream of another „four year term” has blocked his memory. “Let’s be honest: Israel is surrounded by neighbors that have waged repeated wars against it,” he said.
“Israel’s citizens have been killed by rockets fired at their houses and suicide bombs on their buses. Israel’s children come of age knowing that throughout the region, other children are taught to hate them… Israel, a small country of less than eight million people, looks out at a world where leaders of much larger nations threaten to wipe it off of the map. The Jewish people carry the burden of centuries of exile, persecution, and the fresh memory of knowing that six million people were killed simply because of who they were,” Obama said refuting his Cairo speech in which he noted that Israel’s creation had displaced the Palestinians, and that peace required redress for their six decades of suffering.

Netanyahu was very satisfied with Obama’s comments. He praised the US president at a joint press conference prior to a meeting between them on the sidelines of the UNGA in New York. Obama said that it was a pleasure to welcome Netanyahu to the US, opining that Washington’s “pursuit of a just and lasting peace” is compatible with Israel’s needs and “puts Israel’s security at the forefront.”
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman also praised Obama: „I congratulate President Obama. I am ready to sign on this speech with both hands,” hailing the Obama’s omission of issues such as settlements and the 1967 borders.
Obama’s excessive love to Israel had surfaced after two years in office marred by a series of failures in foreign and home policies. Without the Israel lobby in the US, Obama’s chances of another term at the White House are slim. In May this year, Netanyahu delivered a speech at the US Congress. The exaggerated reaction by congressmen to every couple of Netanyahu’s sentences, as in applauding and standing up every 2 two minutes, made the event more theatrical than political; just like everything that involves Israel’s interests and security at the expense of the American taxpayers, the Palestinians, the Lebanese, the Syrians and all the anti-Israel camp in the region.

Jewish Americans for Obama: „Israel has never had a better friend than President Obama.”

„… The new website–Jewish Americans for Obama–was disclosed Tuesday in a call to Jewish community activists. It features a video testimonial from Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon saying Israel „has never had a better friend than President Obama.”
Two key Obama campaign surrogates–Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Florida) and former Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Florida)–joined the call to Jewish activists….”

Posted by G, M, Z, or B at 4:12 PM

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

http://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/2011/09/from-cairo-to-new-york-obamas-stances.html

No Turkey This Thanksgiving

 

by Philip Giraldi

 

 …Turkey is an ally. Israel is not. Turkey has served United States strategic interests. Israel has not. Turkey has hosted American bases and committed its soldiers to support their American counterparts in combat. Israel has not.

Israel has done little more vis-à-vis the United States’ real interests than take more than a hundred billion dollars in taxpayer provided largesse, use Washington as a veto machine to protect its own interests, and betray all of that by spying and stealing defense secrets which were later traded to the Russians and sold to the Chinese.

Abramowitz wants to use the US Navy to protect Israel against the consequences of its own actions and is willing to attack an alliance member which is insisting on freedom of the seas and some accountability for the killing of its own citizens.

TURKEY THE NEW REGIONAL HUB!

The United Nations’ annual opening of the General Assembly each September affords heads of state and heads of government the opportunity to meet both formally and informally. The upcoming meeting between President Barack Obama and Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan promises to be particularly contentious. How exactly it plays out will inevitably demonstrate the astonishing power of Israel and its Lobby. Obama is expected to rebuke Erdogan over the issue of Palestinian statehood, which Turkey supports, and over the willingness of Ankara to use its own warships to protect Turkish vessels in international waters that are seeking to sail to Gaza. They have good reason to do so. In June 2010, the Israelis boarded a Turkish ferry in international waters and killed nine Turks, one of whom was also an American citizen, most of whom were shot execution style.

Turkey: Ally since 1949

GEN. WALKER AND TURKISH TROOPS, KOREA

Turkey has been a NATO ally since 1949, hosting numerous American bases and the key intelligence listening post at Sinop, which had unique ability to monitor Soviet ballistic missile launches. Turkish soldiers in the Korean War were regarded as some of the finest engaged in that conflict. And they have fought and died to save American lives. The 5,000 men of the 1st Turkish Brigade were attached to 2nd then to the 25th US Infantry Divisions. In 1950, after the Chinese breakthrough, they fought a series of bloody rearguard actions covering the retreat of the American troops in which they suffered more than 3,500 casualties.

But American congressmen and pundits, particularly those who are particularly enamored of Israel, seem to have forgotten their history, if they ever knew it. In September 16th Washington Post Morton Abramowitz, a former US Ambassador to Turkey, opined the following:

Erdogan “now directly challenges our major alliance in the Middle East, and how far he will go is unclear…By threatening to militarily contest Israel’s blockade of Gaza…the Turkish government has laid down a serious challenge to American policy…Obama’s meeting with Erdogan on Tuesday is crucial. He can take a few important steps. He should immediately deploy 6th Fleet ships from Norfolk to the Eastern Mediterranean to signal that the United States will not tolerate even inadvertent naval clashes. He needs to make clear to Erdogan that the United States will not side with Turkey against Israel and that Turkey’s current strategy risks undermining regional stability.”

And there’s more. Seven United States Senators have sent a letter to President Obama stating that “Turkey is shifting to a policy of confrontation, if not hostility, towards our allies in Israel and we urge you to mount a diplomatic offensive to reverse this course. We ask you to outline Turkey’s eroding support in Congress…and how its current ill-advised policy towards the State of Israel will also negatively reflect on U.S. Turkish relations and Turkey’s role in the future of NATO.” The Senators are Mark Kirk, Charles Schumer, Mark Warner, Scott Brown, Joe Manchin, Joe Lieberman, and Kirsten Gillibrand.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gives Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu a high five at the start of their bilateral meeting at the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi on June 9. 2011 (Reuters)

Comparing Turkey to Israel

Abramowitz and the Senators reveal their own ignorance apart from anything else. Turkey is an ally. Israel is not. Turkey has served United States strategic interests. Israel has not. Turkey has hosted American bases and committed its soldiers to support their American counterparts in combat. Israel has not. Israel has done little more vis-à-vis the United States’ real interests than take more than a hundred billion dollars in taxpayer provided largesse, use Washington as a veto machine to protect its own interests, and betray all of that by spying and stealing defense secrets which were later traded to the Russians and sold to the Chinese.

Abramowitz wants to use the US Navy to protect Israel against the consequences of its own actions and is willing to attack an alliance member which is insisting on freedom of the seas and some accountability for the killing of its own citizens.

Americans were once proud of the US Navy when it acted in that fashion, but apparently no longer, at least not in the White House nor among some retired ambassadors. The Senators are threatening to use all means possible to punish Turkey not because it has done damage to the United States but because of its strained relationship with a third country, Israel. The Senators even threaten reducing Turkey’s role in NATO. Excuse me, but NATO is an alliance with equal partners, isn’t it, not an American fiefdom?

Sacrificing US interests for the Israel Lobby

So why all the defensiveness about Israel when Israel is a liability and Turkey a valuable asset strategically? Well, there’s an election coming up, which means that President Obama will do everything he can to appease Israel and its Lobby without any regard for the United States national interest or for old allies like Turkey. He will ignore world opinion by vetoing Palestinian statehood at the UN and he will make clear to the Turks that Israel always comes first, the single immutable factor in American foreign policy. Israel will always come first. And there will be plenty of congressmen and Morton Abramowitzes that will stand up and say that he is right to do so.

Source: Council for the National Interest

 

Ce  este anti-sioniste? Este o minciună, el este un termen pe care le-au pus la cale. Am fost timp de zece ani ca un rabin – o poziţie-cheie publică în Statul Israel . În ce mod sunt nu suntem sionişti ?Ne rugăm pentru Sion, pentru Ierusalim şi locuitorii săi, pentru Israel şi de rabini şi de elevii lor. Ce este sionist? Prin înţelegerea noastră, un sionist este o persoană care iubeşte Sion şi practicile porunca de soluţionare a terenului. Ori de câte ori eu sunt de peste mări Doresc să încurajez  Aliyah. În ce mod sunt ele mai mult decât ne-sionist?

1. Ce un măgar. Ca majoritatea cititorilor de pe acest site sunt conştienţi, inclusiv partidul Shasmembri, ne-am făcut distractiv al Partidului Shas de ceva timp aici. Nimic nu face tuyuur aici la Mantiq Al-Tayr râde lor a evalua mai mult de comentariile complet nebun al Partidului Shas lui „spiritual” lider (şi prin „spiritual” ne referim la „nenorocit rasist”), care har aproape fiecare singură menţiune care le face. Cel puţin e consistent. Să aruncăm o privire la unele dintre operei sale recente. Nu puteţi face asta.

În primul rând,  comentând  pe criza actuală Israelului cu Turcia, membră NATO:

(Nota pentru Shas membrilor de partid, scoate în evidenţă roşu sunt ale mele.)

„Turcia, Burkey, Dumnezeu Atotputernicul nu ar putea grijă mai puţin despre ele.

„Este tot un nonsens. Dacă Dumnezeu îşi întinde mâinile asupra lor pentru un moment – acestea vor fi făcute nefericit intr-un minut. Noi credem în mântuirea lui Dumnezeu cel Atotputernic. Am Dumnezeu Atotputernic, iar noi suntem fiii săi. Cel care a învins Faraon, Egipt şi Aman – va învinge toţi inamicii lui Israel „.

Acelaşi articol cita acest clovn, de asemenea, ia act de modul în care acesta doreşte moartea pentru conducerea palestiniene şi consideră că poporul palestinian „rău”.

„Doi dintre situaţiile rabinului au stârnit o mulţime de furie, şi chiar tensiuni diplomatice. Anul trecut, înainte de Roş Haşana, Yosef Mahmoud Abbas şi oamenii lui, care el a numit „raul dusmanilor lui Israel.”

„Rabinul menţionat binecuvântarea spus la Anul Nou evreiesc sărbătoare care afirmă, „mai duşmanii noştri şi adversarii să fie distrus”, şi a aplicat-o cu situaţia actuală. „Abu Mazen (Abbas), precum şi toţi acei oameni răi – ar putea, ei vor pieri din această lume. Fie ca Dumnezeu cel Atotputernic le grevă şi aceste palestinieni. ”

Acum, acest extremist foarte acelaşi religios violent, de asemenea, recent, sa dus la Dan Shapiro, care ar putea fi şi un agent de informaţii israelian, vreau sa spun ce diferenta este posibil ar face dacă el ar fi fost înlocuite de către un funcţionar important Mossad?, Dar am face o digresiune.Oricum, acest loc de muncă de piuliţă flăcări întâlnit recent cu „american” (hahahahaha), ambasadorul statului evreu şi  a spus  că Partidul Shas susţine pace. Serios? Aceasta după care doresc moartea pe palestinieni? Apoi, după ce a spus Shapiro că susţine „pace”, mesajul reală a ieşit:

„Yosef, de asemenea, implorat Shapiro să facă totul în puterea sa pentru a aduce eliberarea de agent israelian Jonathan Pollard din închisoare în SUA.”

Pariez că Vice President israelian pentru afaceri american (IVPFAA) Baruch Obama a permite Pollard stele din închisoare în cazul în care arata ca el va pierde la una dintre părţi Shas nebuni republicanii sunt la punerea la alegerile de anul viitor. Dar am face o digresiune. Să ne întoarcem la Ovadia Yosef.

Eşti  de stânga ? Atunci eşti un un înger rău. Fara gluma. Bucuraţi-vă de acest lucru:

„HaGaon HaRav Ovadia Yosef Shlita pe Shabbos fixat împotriva israelian de stânga , oameni de asteptare asociat cu mişcarea „Malachei Chabala”, îngeri distructive. HaDor Gadol a făcut aceste remarci în timpul unei shiur săptămână în Har Nof. El a explicat că toţi avem dreptul nostru la îngeri şi de la stânga şi în timp ce cea din dreapta mereu lupte in numele nostru, una pe stânga fabrică împotriva noastră. Rav a explicat că, în Israel, ne-am prea-o la stânga, şi ele sunt Malachei Chabala. ”

Fundul Nutty Rabini de multe ori  dau vina  catastrofele naturale in SUA pe politica Statelor Unite faţă de Israel, care nu poate fi niciodată suficient de aservită, în măsura în care acestea sunt în cauză.Yosef deşi ia bagajul, ca să spunem aşa:

„Dupa ce uraganul Katrina care a decimat New Orleans, rabinul Ovadia Yosef a menţionat că „Este o pedeapsă pentru Statele Unite, pentru sprijinirea dezangajare. „
„Ei merita. Bush a fost de la cei responsabili pentru expulzarea evreilor din Gush Katif , a spus Sharon de a expulza pe evrei. Aici au existat 15 de mii, acolo [în New Orleans] au fost 150 de mii. Aceasta este pedeapsa pentru ceea ce a făcut la Gush Katif. Dacă au avut loc alegeri acum el ar fi pierdut.Toţi cei care au participat la această atrocitate va primi pedepsit. „
Bine, asta e suficient pentru acum despre Yosef. Oh, stai. Permiteţi-mi să meniurile unul mai  citat din acest loc de muncă piuliţă.
„Într-o predică octombrie 2010, Yosef a declarat că” singurul scop de non-evrei este de a servi evreilor „. El a spus că Neamurile a servit unui scop divin: „De ce sunt necesare pentru neamuri? Ei vor lucra, ei vor plug, ei vor culege. Vom sta ca un Effendi şi să mănânce. Acesta este motivul pentru neamurile au fost create. „

Şi că, goys si fete, este de aproximativ la fel de bun, un rezumat al creştinismului american după cum veţi găsi oriunde.

2. Casa de boxe, John Boehner (pronuntat „Firster israelian”), duminică umilit tuturor americanilor adevărat în tipic israeliano-moda saruta cu fundul său discurs  înainte de Fondul Naţional Evreiesc din Cincinnati, Israel. A fost un fel de exprimare, pe care atât Ovadia Yosef şi Dan Shapiro ar fi fost mândru de. Am legat de discursul întreg  aici , dar aici e un tânăr de citate alegere astfel încât să puteţi obţine gustul a ceea ce e ca să pupe în fund lui Israel atât de bine.

Iată un citat despre cât de mare a fost să vorbesc cu Netanhayu Congre $ $ in primavara anului trecut.

„” Pentru mine, una dintre cele mai puternice au avut loc mai atunci când prim-ministrul Netanyahu a adresat o şedinţa comună a Congresului. „A fost onoarea mea de a invita him.It a fost cel ce-am putut face pentru liderul unuia dintre cei mai apropiaţi aliaţi noastre în lumea. „Bibi nu a dezamăgit. El a primit aproape 30 de ovaţii în picioare … ovaţii în picioare bipartizan. . Toate bine-meritata „Doamnelor şi domnilor, am invitat premierul Netanyahu să abordeze Congresului, deoarece poporul american meritat să aud de la el – şi Washington, destul de sincer, este nevoie să audă ce avea el de spus.”

Acum, nu ca să vă dau doar jeebies heebie?

Cum despre acest pere de înţelepciune?
„Sprijinirea Israel şi poporului ei a fost politica a acestei naţiuni, deoarece Harry Truman stătea în Biroul Oval.” Angajamentul nostru în Israel ar trebui să fie astăzi nu mai puţin puternice. Dacă ceva, ar trebui să fie mai puternică decât cum a fost mereu. Şi, cu ajutorul tau, acesta va fi. Acesta trebuie să fie. „
Boehner nu par să aibă un simţ al umorului:
„Proclamarea israelian imaginat un stat bazat pe libertate, dreptate şi pace, una care garantează libertatea de religie, conştiinţă, limbă, educaţie, cultură şi.” Acesta a vorbit despre o ţară care ar promova dezvoltarea economică în beneficiul tuturor locuitorilor săi. „
Acesta este, de asemenea 911 de interesant cu privire la:

„Aniversarea recent de la 11 septembrie a fost o reamintire a durerii noastre comune.” Există doar un singur loc în lume din afara Statelor Unite care listează numele tuturor nevinovaţi care au murit în acea zi. „Acesta este situat pe un deal, la intrarea în Ierusalim. Şi a fost construit de către Fondul Naţional Evreiesc. Vă mulţumesc. ”

3. Deci, ce este Fondul Naţional Evreiesc? Ei bine, pentru inceput

„Fondul Naţional Evreiesc este listat de către IRS ca un 501 (c) (3) non-profit Toate donaţiile sunt deductibile fiscal în cea mai mare măsură de lege.”

Ceea ce urmează este de la site-ul lor pe pagina intitulată  „munca pe care o facem . „

„National Evreiesc Fondul a fost înfiinţat mai mult de 100 de ani în urmă de către un grup mic de lideri, inclusiv Theodor Herzl. Prin achiziţionarea de terenuri, sperau să stabilească bazele de naştere al naţiunii noastre de Israel. JNF continuă să facă un angajament de a terenurilor şi de oamenii din secolul 21. In timp ce noi încă plantarea de copaci şi de crearea de parcuri, organizaţia noastră are atât de mult mai mult. Citiţi pentru a vedea modul în care facem o diferenta pentru generaţiile viitoare. ”

Ce JNF este, desigur, este o organizaţie rasistă masquarading ca o organizaţie de caritate care urmăreşte să beneficieze de evrei în detrimentul palestinienilor în timp ce obţinerea simultan facilităţi fiscale pentru a face acest lucru atât de guvernele SUA şi Marea Britanie. Dacă doriţi să aflaţi mai multe despre activităţile lor nefaste pe care le subvenţionează, puteţi obţine o electronică gratuită despre JNF  aici . De fapt, de ce nu a descărca o copie şi de  e-mail  -l la John Boehner?

Iată un citat dintr-o  recenzie  a cărţii menţionate mai sus:

„Introducerea Ilan Pappe dezvăluie prin angajament deschis a fondatorilor JNF la expulzare, ceea ce este astăzi numit” purificare etnica „, a palestinienilor autohtone şi înlocuirea lor de către imigranţi evrei. Pappe discută succesul JNF în obţinerea o mare parte a terenurilor jefuite de la palestinieni de către miliţiile sionist prin crimă şi violenţă în 1948 şi controlul acestuia eficientă a mult mai mult prin rolul său în calitate de agent al Statului Israel în păstrarea aproape toate suprafaţa de teren de Israel pentru proprietate exclusiv evreieşti, pe cheltuiala lui Israel un milion de cetăţeni palestinieni. Autorul arată îndrăzneala JNF în prezentându-se ca un „verde”, mişcare ca aceasta copaci plante, cu scopul expres de distrugerea tuturor urmelor de comunităţilor etnic curăţate şi distruse palestinian. ”

Iată un citat despre un alt capitol din carte din aceeaşi revistă:
„Uri Davis analizează Parcul britanic, a proclamat într-un semn acolo ca” un dar al Fondului Naţional Evreiesc al Marii Britanii „Parcul britanică este construit pe sate etnic curăţate palestinian de Ajjur şi Zakariyya., Făcând UKJNF implicat în crime de război şi improprii pentru statutul de caritate pe motive de multiple încălcări ale dreptului umanitar internaţional. Surprinzător, Prof. Davis susţine că Parcul britanic este utilizat pentru a stoca o parte din armele nucleare ale Israelului de distrugere în masă. „

Se pare că mişcarea BDS, de asemenea,  clienţi  -un alt electronică gratuită cu privire la JNF pentru toate copac huggers acolo. Si da, imi place prea copaci şi au dat mai mult de un frumos o îmbrăţişare mare. Eu nu îmbrăţişez cele plantate de JNF, dar am face o digresiune. Oricum, cartea este intitulată: Apartheid greenwashing: Coverup Naţional Evreiesc Fondului de Mediu şi îl puteţi obţine gratuit  aici .

Iată un citat din recenzie foarte scurt, pe site-ul BDS:

„Este o dovadă că documentele JNF nu este o organizaţie de mediu, ci mai degrabă un instrument de purificare etnică şi implicat în crimes.Contributors război sunt din Statele Unite ale Americii, Marea Britanie, Canada şi Palestina, cu o apoi de către scriitor american şi de activist de mediu Kovel Joel. În carte, Akram Salhab descrie dezastru ecologic de a JNF drenare a lacului Hula şi Corey Balsamul analizează rolul ideologic de plantarea de copaci. David Schwartzman face legătura între JNF, asediul din Gaza şi de securitate climatice, în timp ce Coya White Hat-Artichoker, un membru al tribului Sioux Rosebud, contribuie un discurs pe primul Naţiunilor-palestinian solidaritate. ”

Deci, asta e grupul Boehner a fost să vorbesc cu. Te face mândru să fie un american, nu-i aşa?

4. Primul nostru film este un film video de formare pentru oricine care vrea să se implice în „American” sistem politic. Acest clip video foarte scurt, atât de scurt nu va contesta atentie chiar şi a membrilor cei mai avizi Partidului Shas, vă oferă tot ce aveţi nevoie să ştiţi pentru a fi un succes „american” politician.

Îmi place munca de Deek Jackson. Iata video de ultima sa dragoste, intitulat „Suck My veto”, sau ceva de genul asta.

http://mantiqaltayr.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/250px-ovadya_yosef.jpg?w=250&h=206

WASHINGTON – Republican U.S. presidential frontrunner Rick Perry on Friday accused President Barack Obama of distancing himself from Israel and blamed U.S. foreign policy “errors” for a Palestinian push for statehood at the United Nations.

 

Seeking to capitalize on this week’s Republican election victory in a heavily Jewish New York congressional district, Perry said Palestinian leaders believe U.S.-Israeli relations have weakened and alleged that “the ultimate Palestinian solution” remains the destruction of the Jewish state.

“Errors by the Obama administration have encouraged the Palestinians,” the Texas governor wrote in a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed piece.

“It was a mistake to agree to the Palestinians’ demand for indirect negotiations conducted through the U.S., and it was an even greater mistake for President Obama to distance himself from Israel and seek engagement with the hostile regimes in Syria and Iran.”

Palestinian leaders are threatening to defy the United States and push for full membership at the United Nations next week, a move that would deliver a serious blow to U.S. influence in the region.

The United States has warned that such an attempt would damage chances of reviving talks and sent envoys to the region this week to lobby the Palestinians.

Washington has vowed to veto the Palestinian move and is threatening to cut the roughly $500 million in annual U.S. aid to the Palestinians. Israel on Thursday urged the international community to maintain assistance.

Perry endorsed the veto plan but called on the administration to make U.S. aid to the Palestinians conditional on their willingness to negotiate with Israel.

Jewish concerns about Obama’s policies toward Israel helped Republicans win a Democratic congressional district in New York this week for the first time in more than 80 years.

In a potential harbinger of the national Jewish vote in 2012, analysts said many voters in the district believe Obama has failed to support Israel and object to his call for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations to use the Jewish state’s pre-1967 borders as a starting point.

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/international/2011/September/international_September657.xml&section=international